Image of the day

Captured by
John Greenlee

Before and after

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: George Wilkie

June 12, 2003 08:16 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Scope recommendation

Posted By George Wilkie

Greetings all! I've been looking at buying a new scope for about a month and it will probably be another before I get the money to get it. I've considered a countless number of telescopes and I am in that position now where the information/myths are just too overwhelming. I imagine this will be quite a long post, but if anyone out there would be willing to take the time to help me out, I would really appreciate it.

I am a 3rd year college student in New Orleans, and while the skies are horribly light polluted, the city has its own advantages ;o) I am looking for a new telescope as a peaceful "get-away", as an alternative to reading, television, surfing the net, etc. My ideal observing session would be sitting behind the eyepiece of a scope, sketching planetary and brighter deep space detail, generally enjoying the view, while offering a peek to whoever is around, just to give you an idea of the type of observing I would like to do.

My budget is around $1000 complete including worthwhile acessories (although I have a bad feeling I'll find some way to justify spending a couple hundred more).

About 6 years ago, I bought a 4.5" Celestron newtonian. It served me well for a year or two until my parents didn't want it in the living room and it became a centerpiece in my room on which to put track medals, leighs, stickers, etc. This was probably a combination of mediocre images, running out of things to see from my backyard, unessesary bulk, and poor mount.

I'll have plenty of floor space/movable furniture in my room, so size isn't much of a problem, but portability certainly is. I need a scope that can be comfortably carried (with mount) down the hall and up a flight of stairs to a top-floor patio in one or two trips (much preferably one). I am willing to invest about $100 for a carrying case that can fit the entire scope or just the OTA. By the way, if anyone's interested, I've heard that golf bag cases meant to transport golf bags as luggage make great scope cases when padded with foam. An $80 case with wheels can transport a 6" refractor tube. Not a bad idea! Also, the scope needs to be easily shipped/put in storage a couple times a year. While I'm fired up now, realistically I don't see myself driving out to a dark sky site more than a couple times a year. It should also be able to handle long car drives for drives back home to NY.

I am particularly interested in detail; that is, enough detail to make a good sketch. While hunting for faint fuzzies is fun for a while, this can be done from any scope (even if the "faint fuzzy" is M57!), so its not my highest priority. I would like to see detail *within* Jupiter's cloud belts, as well as on Saturns disk and rings, give nebulas and galaxies at least some defined shape, etc. Basically, considerably more detail than my old 4.5" reflector, enough to make setting it up worth it.

[continued on next post]

June 12, 2003 08:17 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Scope recommendation (cont'd)

Posted By George Wilkie


I'm not sure what kind of climate conditions contribute to seeing. Let's just say that its almost always like a sauna during the summer, but nice temperatures in the winder/spring months but the high humidity still lingers. On the bright side, cooldown isn't a problem then its usually warmer outside at night during the summers anyway.

So, in a nutshell: the scope needs to be able to handle moderately high magnifications (about 200x), but also be able to give a good view of a wide star field with a good eyepiece (although with light pollution, I don't know how impressive this view will be, I would still like to have to ability if I ever find myself under a dark sky). Good contrast/resolution is a high priority. I also wouldn't mind paying a little extra for high-quality optics.

So that's about it, thanks for taking the time to read this. If anyone has had experience in my situation/conditions, your reccomendation would be most helpful. I would go to a star party, but there really aren't any clubs here or back home. While I have a few scopes that I am interested in, I would like as many "clean-slate" reccomendations as possible, so I won't mention them.

Clear skies and thank you again,
George

June 12, 2003 08:17 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Scope recommendation

Posted By George Wilkie


I'm not sure what kind of climate conditions contribute to seeing. Let's just say that its almost always like a sauna during the summer, but nice temperatures in the winder/spring months but the high humidity still lingers. On the bright side, cooldown isn't a problem then its usually warmer outside at night during the summers anyway.

So, in a nutshell: the scope needs to be able to handle moderately high magnifications (about 200x), but also be able to give a good view of a wide star field with a good eyepiece (although with light pollution, I don't know how impressive this view will be, I would still like to have to ability if I ever find myself under a dark sky). Good contrast/resolution is a high priority. I also wouldn't mind paying a little extra for high-quality optics.

So that's about it, thanks for taking the time to read this. If anyone has had experience in my situation/conditions, your reccomendation would be most helpful. I would go to a star party, but there really aren't any clubs here or back home. While I have a few scopes that I am interested in, I would like as many "clean-slate" reccomendations as possible, so I won't mention them.

Clear skies and thank you again,
George

June 17, 2003 12:31 AM Forum: Equipment Talk

Scope recommendation

Posted By George Wilkie

Thank you everybody for your input, I certainly appreciate it.

I am gravitating heavily toward the MK-67, but am (again) considering a 8" SCT such as the C8 or LX10. What I want to know is, does the superior optics of the MK-67 make up for its loss of aperature (and higher cost) compared to the 8" schmidt? Remember, this is coming from a mainly planetary-detail perspective from a light-polluted sky.

And how would the 8" SCT compare to the Orion 5" Mak or Skyview Pro 120mm synta refractor on planets? (in case I can't afford the Intes)

Thanks again,
George