DiscMount DM-6 CommentsPosted By Sean McGrath |
Here are some comments from my initial experience with this setup - and its use with a Takahashi TOA-130.
These are mostly comments and ramblings, so please excuse the format:
This is my only mount, and was chosen for simplicity, which includes
the absence of counter weights.
Currently do not have the SkyCommander installed, though I did get the
encoder kit. The encoder kit fully enclosed inside of the mount is an
elegant solution (which I will say even though it sounds lame). It is
very nice and tidy. One thing that might be a problem for me, is that
given the length of the Tak OTA and the position of the shelf for the
SkyCommander, it might be a hassle to use the SkyCommander comfortably.
Chose to go with Astro Physics (AP) wood tripod for height
adjustability. The center section from Richard Lapides (discussion
and pictures on the ap-ug Yahoo! group) was also quite appealing,
making the AP wood tripod fold up like a regular camera tripod
(nothing to disassemble)
Turns out AP tripod was probably necessary anyway (despite the lure of
the Lapides center section), given the length of the TOA-130 when used
to view at zenith. View at zenith can be a bit of a hassle because
the legs of the tripod can be in the way at certain positions, but it
is still possible to use in this manner.
This setup works quite well, despite the weight of a fully outfitted
TOA-130 at around 30-35lbs (OTA, University Optics (UO) finder, AP 2"
diagonal, parallax rings, and Pentax XW EP).
One thing to be careful of (if you have a heavier setup especially) is
tipping. Naturally, the weight of a scope on one side can cause the
mount to want to tip much more easily than if the weight was centered
over the tripod. Not that I have even had my mount tip or close to
tipping, but if you had the mount on a surface that was not level (and
favored the heavier side) be careful about lifting the legs to insert
celestron vsp pads, for example
Use of celestron vibration pads VSP, results in about 1/2 sec damp
time if a sharp tap is given to the diagonal. I can focus (standard
tak focuser) without vibration being a problem at 200x-280x (5mmm and
3.5mm Pentax XW EP). I don't have a lot of experience with mounts,
but I must say I find this setup very enjoyable to use - compared to a
TV127 on a Televue mount and tripod I tried to use one time.
The mount is still breaking in, as I have only had it out for about a
half dozen times so far. The delrin discs are still wearing in. The
mount is not as smooth as I would like right now, but part of that has
to do with the azimuth adjustment. The altitude adjustment uses two
spring washers (against the ball bearing, under the adjustment nut),
while there are no washers on the azimuth. The spring washers give a
varying degree of adjustment (providing tension), and the absence of
washers on the azimuth leads to something that is too loose or too
tight. I am currently awating a new spring washer from Tom at
DiscMounts, which he says will fix the problem. I think with the new
spring washer and using the mount a bit more to break it in, I will be
quite happy.
One minor annoyance with my configuration, is that it can be
troublesome to hoist the TOA-130 OTA into the G11 saddle when the AP
tripod is at full height. I looked at the Robin Cassady plates (where
you can tip the dovetail into the saddle plate) but I think the
sliding configuration is safer - less likely to drop the scope in the
attachment process.
Last quirk/tidbit:
There seems to be a light clicking noise that comes from the ball
bearings in either axis of the mount, only at a certain point. I
think it has to do with a rough part in each of the bearings - maybe
not enough lubrication, damaged while being pressed in? I'm not
really sure. Not much of an issue, because they are still smooth
enough, and they are not really critical anyway, as it is the bronze
sleeve bushings that really do most of the work, along with the delrin
plates. If I reassemble the mount with the bearings in a different
position, I actually wouldn't hear this noise again. Tom said he
hasn't heard of this problem, but I plan to keep an eye on it - though
like I said, this is not critical to the operation.
Overall I must say that I am quite happy with this configuration,
given the ease to which it can be brought out and set up. The mount
creates a simple and stable platform for the TOA-130 - which is
exactly what I was looking for. Now, if Tom would only come out with
the tracking platform that he has been talking about.....
(these comments were copied from the Yahoo! group "discmounts" - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/discmounts/
If anybody is interested, I hope to post more pictures and further information there in the future. I hope other discmount users might do the same.)
These are mostly comments and ramblings, so please excuse the format:
This is my only mount, and was chosen for simplicity, which includes
the absence of counter weights.
Currently do not have the SkyCommander installed, though I did get the
encoder kit. The encoder kit fully enclosed inside of the mount is an
elegant solution (which I will say even though it sounds lame). It is
very nice and tidy. One thing that might be a problem for me, is that
given the length of the Tak OTA and the position of the shelf for the
SkyCommander, it might be a hassle to use the SkyCommander comfortably.
Chose to go with Astro Physics (AP) wood tripod for height
adjustability. The center section from Richard Lapides (discussion
and pictures on the ap-ug Yahoo! group) was also quite appealing,
making the AP wood tripod fold up like a regular camera tripod
(nothing to disassemble)
Turns out AP tripod was probably necessary anyway (despite the lure of
the Lapides center section), given the length of the TOA-130 when used
to view at zenith. View at zenith can be a bit of a hassle because
the legs of the tripod can be in the way at certain positions, but it
is still possible to use in this manner.
This setup works quite well, despite the weight of a fully outfitted
TOA-130 at around 30-35lbs (OTA, University Optics (UO) finder, AP 2"
diagonal, parallax rings, and Pentax XW EP).
One thing to be careful of (if you have a heavier setup especially) is
tipping. Naturally, the weight of a scope on one side can cause the
mount to want to tip much more easily than if the weight was centered
over the tripod. Not that I have even had my mount tip or close to
tipping, but if you had the mount on a surface that was not level (and
favored the heavier side) be careful about lifting the legs to insert
celestron vsp pads, for example
Use of celestron vibration pads VSP, results in about 1/2 sec damp
time if a sharp tap is given to the diagonal. I can focus (standard
tak focuser) without vibration being a problem at 200x-280x (5mmm and
3.5mm Pentax XW EP). I don't have a lot of experience with mounts,
but I must say I find this setup very enjoyable to use - compared to a
TV127 on a Televue mount and tripod I tried to use one time.
The mount is still breaking in, as I have only had it out for about a
half dozen times so far. The delrin discs are still wearing in. The
mount is not as smooth as I would like right now, but part of that has
to do with the azimuth adjustment. The altitude adjustment uses two
spring washers (against the ball bearing, under the adjustment nut),
while there are no washers on the azimuth. The spring washers give a
varying degree of adjustment (providing tension), and the absence of
washers on the azimuth leads to something that is too loose or too
tight. I am currently awating a new spring washer from Tom at
DiscMounts, which he says will fix the problem. I think with the new
spring washer and using the mount a bit more to break it in, I will be
quite happy.
One minor annoyance with my configuration, is that it can be
troublesome to hoist the TOA-130 OTA into the G11 saddle when the AP
tripod is at full height. I looked at the Robin Cassady plates (where
you can tip the dovetail into the saddle plate) but I think the
sliding configuration is safer - less likely to drop the scope in the
attachment process.
Last quirk/tidbit:
There seems to be a light clicking noise that comes from the ball
bearings in either axis of the mount, only at a certain point. I
think it has to do with a rough part in each of the bearings - maybe
not enough lubrication, damaged while being pressed in? I'm not
really sure. Not much of an issue, because they are still smooth
enough, and they are not really critical anyway, as it is the bronze
sleeve bushings that really do most of the work, along with the delrin
plates. If I reassemble the mount with the bearings in a different
position, I actually wouldn't hear this noise again. Tom said he
hasn't heard of this problem, but I plan to keep an eye on it - though
like I said, this is not critical to the operation.
Overall I must say that I am quite happy with this configuration,
given the ease to which it can be brought out and set up. The mount
creates a simple and stable platform for the TOA-130 - which is
exactly what I was looking for. Now, if Tom would only come out with
the tracking platform that he has been talking about.....
(these comments were copied from the Yahoo! group "discmounts" - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/discmounts/
If anybody is interested, I hope to post more pictures and further information there in the future. I hope other discmount users might do the same.)