COMPARING CAMERAS - INTANGIBLES?Posted By Derek Baker |
To all imagers
I am looking at getting a CCD camera, and I must confess that the choices of camera and manufacturer is getting overwhelming! If you take just the KAF11000 chip, you have Finger Lakes, Sbig, Apogee(several models), Starlight Express all building a camera around that chip (and probably a few I have missed!) If 4MP or 6MP chips are included, then you add QSI, Trifid, and a few other reputable companies. Yikes!
I have read each manufacturer's stats for their cameras, and I understand the differences in cooling, weight, accessories, filter wheel choices etc, BUT I'd love to hear from some of you who have experience in the field with cameras from each manufacturer.
Are there unadvertised differences between manufacturers that affect the ease of use, reliability, and quality of images? For example, is one manufacturer putting in better coverslips, optical windows, AR coatings, etc? Does one manufacturer tend to need the chamber purged and desicant recharged more often? Are there quality control issues with any particular cameras?
I'm not wanting to ignite a flame-war between users of different makes of camera...we all can certainly agree that products from all of these reputable manufacturers can produce excellent results. Sometimes it's a matter of matching the good and bad for a particular model/manufacturer with our own priorities & tastes. Nevertheless I'd like to have some knowledge of the 'real world' pluses and minuses for each manufacturer's fundamental design/construction prior to shelling out some major cash for a new camera!
Any input from you experienced imagers would be greatly appreciated!
regards,
Derek
I am looking at getting a CCD camera, and I must confess that the choices of camera and manufacturer is getting overwhelming! If you take just the KAF11000 chip, you have Finger Lakes, Sbig, Apogee(several models), Starlight Express all building a camera around that chip (and probably a few I have missed!) If 4MP or 6MP chips are included, then you add QSI, Trifid, and a few other reputable companies. Yikes!
I have read each manufacturer's stats for their cameras, and I understand the differences in cooling, weight, accessories, filter wheel choices etc, BUT I'd love to hear from some of you who have experience in the field with cameras from each manufacturer.
Are there unadvertised differences between manufacturers that affect the ease of use, reliability, and quality of images? For example, is one manufacturer putting in better coverslips, optical windows, AR coatings, etc? Does one manufacturer tend to need the chamber purged and desicant recharged more often? Are there quality control issues with any particular cameras?
I'm not wanting to ignite a flame-war between users of different makes of camera...we all can certainly agree that products from all of these reputable manufacturers can produce excellent results. Sometimes it's a matter of matching the good and bad for a particular model/manufacturer with our own priorities & tastes. Nevertheless I'd like to have some knowledge of the 'real world' pluses and minuses for each manufacturer's fundamental design/construction prior to shelling out some major cash for a new camera!
Any input from you experienced imagers would be greatly appreciated!
regards,
Derek