To change secondary size or not???Posted By Mark Peterman |
Thanks for all the replies and the link to the Mel Bartles secondary calculator. I have attached a photo of the results using both mirror sizes.
The columns show a list of off-axis radius, the ilumination for this circle and the light loss in magnitudes. If the illumination falls below 70%, that line is shown in red.
The Tele Vue website lists the 24mm Panoptic as having a field stop of 27mm which would be a radius of 13.5mm. Looking at these results, does that mean that I would still have over 75% illumination across the whole field with that eyepiece and a 2.1" secondary? (roughly 95% illumination with the 2.6" secondary)
With this additional information, are there any other thoughts on the benefits of (or not) switching to a 2.1" secondary on this scope?
Thanks,
Mark
P.S. I'm learning from the feedback and hopefully others will benefit too.
The columns show a list of off-axis radius, the ilumination for this circle and the light loss in magnitudes. If the illumination falls below 70%, that line is shown in red.
The Tele Vue website lists the 24mm Panoptic as having a field stop of 27mm which would be a radius of 13.5mm. Looking at these results, does that mean that I would still have over 75% illumination across the whole field with that eyepiece and a 2.1" secondary? (roughly 95% illumination with the 2.6" secondary)
With this additional information, are there any other thoughts on the benefits of (or not) switching to a 2.1" secondary on this scope?
Thanks,
Mark
P.S. I'm learning from the feedback and hopefully others will benefit too.