Originally Posted by James Lacey
Mike Bowen:
"Like Rick Bright said, it's the scientists we need to be listening to, and we are not. That has got to change or more lives are going to be lost."
Hi James:
It is easy for an epidemiologist to observe, as we cautiously relax the stay at home orders, that extra lives will be lost. I agree, slowly reopening society means extra lives will be lost. This is undeniable.
But, is saving those extra lives worth the measures necessary to save them? I think it is safe to say that the best way to literally minimize the overall number of deaths is to remain locked down indefinitely, at least until we have a 100% effective therapy or vaccine. Does anyone think indefinite total lock down is a tenable plan? Of course not.
So, I disagree that "it is the scientists we need to be listening to," if that statement means "scientists only" and I think it did. I would say that we need to listen to the scientists, economists, philosophers and Joe six-pack too. The brutal calculus is that anything we do short of a total and indefinite national lock down is going to kill some folks, maybe lots of them. We need to weigh the cost of those lives against the cost of minimizing deaths, and that is not a question of pure science.
It certainly is a question that must be informed by science. I don't think that my governor, yours, Kemp or even Trump is
ignoring the scientists. I do think these decisions are bigger than considering only the scientific means to minimize loss of life at all cost.
Jim