After doing a little reading (actually more than just a little), it has become apparent that astronomers know less about the current state of the unverse as distance increases. <br><br>How far were these newly discovered galaxies from our current location when the photons we receive today left them?<br><br>How far were these galaxies from our current location when the photons we receive reached the half-way point to us?<br><br>How far are these galaxies from us now?<br><br>Does UME (dark matter)act based on velocity of expansion alone in compatibility with the effects of relativity? <br><br>If so, could dopler shifted EM be a factored function modifying Hubble's Universal Constant? <br><br>I am not a scientist, but I can't help (now) but wonder if the "Big Bang" is actually not a simple beginning, but rather an incorrectly "diagnosed" threshold which defines a point at which the laws we except as "universal" became relevant within the framework what we accept as physical law.<br><br>As Hubble images reach farther, I can only assume that significant the "things" exist beyond our time horizon - things that dumbfound us and indicate 85%+ of what's out there is beyond us. This makes me wonder if Unidentified Mass and Energy Emulation is in no way exotic other than by its distance and velocity.<br><br>It would seem that dopler effect would ultimately increase the wavelength of Gamma to infinity.<br><br>Perhaps the UME/UEE question is simply unanswerable except through calculation and can not be tested. I really wonder if the answer relates to currently unimaginable age and volume. For all we know, cosmic background readiation might be the basis for an entirely different approach to reaching beyond the 13.7 billion year horizon.