I agree that it was a nice review. However, I don't understand the positive comments about a scope that had issues with the baffle and poorly collimated optics. I'm sure that WO makes a very nice looking scope, but they seem to have qc issues with optics. I don't know about everyone else, but I buy a scope to look through, not look at. Tom T's review of the WO scope also noted that he had to send his first sample back due to optical issues. Here we have one that has similar issues and ended up being "fixed" by the buyer, so I don't understand the high overall ratings given this scope. It's definitely good to hear the WO or the dealer was willing to do whatever it takes to correct the issue!