Has anyone else read the "Saturn Opposition" link on Celestron's home page? What concerns me are the claims for thier Nextar 60 GT, where they show a "simulated" image of Saturn at 175x with the 60GT using the supplied 4mm ocular.
The image shows the Cassini division clearly, along with definite banding on the ball itself. I'm no newbee, but my old Meade #285 refractor (60mm, f/15) just won't show me the cassini, and I aligned it's optics with a laser collimator! My ETX-90 has no problem with these tasks, but it's a stretch for my 60mm. Furthermore, the max mag I can realistically use on this 1980's 2.4 inch telescope is around 128.5x (7mm celestron/vixen ortho) Is Celestron selling a magic 60mm/f12 telescope, or is the supplied 4mm eyepiece exceptional? I feel that either I am in for a big surprise at this year's Saturn opposition, or Celestron is pushing thier outdated inventory! Chris Brown
The image shows the Cassini division clearly, along with definite banding on the ball itself. I'm no newbee, but my old Meade #285 refractor (60mm, f/15) just won't show me the cassini, and I aligned it's optics with a laser collimator! My ETX-90 has no problem with these tasks, but it's a stretch for my 60mm. Furthermore, the max mag I can realistically use on this 1980's 2.4 inch telescope is around 128.5x (7mm celestron/vixen ortho) Is Celestron selling a magic 60mm/f12 telescope, or is the supplied 4mm eyepiece exceptional? I feel that either I am in for a big surprise at this year's Saturn opposition, or Celestron is pushing thier outdated inventory! Chris Brown
There's something on the Moon! 8O