I thought I had solved aperture fever by getting the biggest mirror I could get and still keep my feet on the ground, but here I go again.
My choice is between sticking with a 16" above-average 1.625"-thick f/4.5 mirror with so-so coatings, to using the same structure for a new 17.5" f/4 1"-thick mirror with excellent figure and coatings. Considerations are improved cool-down time, lighter weight, better resolution, and 20% light gain on size alone, probably more like 30% factoring in the quality of the mirror. There's a fair amount of tinkering with the hardware to make it work, but I live for that kind of challenge.
My general rule is that one has to move up 2 aperture classes to get a "Wow! That was worth it!" difference. That would put me into a 20" as my next scope. Any opinions?
My choice is between sticking with a 16" above-average 1.625"-thick f/4.5 mirror with so-so coatings, to using the same structure for a new 17.5" f/4 1"-thick mirror with excellent figure and coatings. Considerations are improved cool-down time, lighter weight, better resolution, and 20% light gain on size alone, probably more like 30% factoring in the quality of the mirror. There's a fair amount of tinkering with the hardware to make it work, but I live for that kind of challenge.
My general rule is that one has to move up 2 aperture classes to get a "Wow! That was worth it!" difference. That would put me into a 20" as my next scope. Any opinions?
"Praise the Lord for the expanding grandeur of creation, worlds known and unknown, galaxies beyond galaxies, filling us with awe and challenging our imaginations." 2007 Reform Siddur