Image of the day

Captured by
Byron Davies

Sh2-86 (NGC-6820)

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

portaball/lightbridge?

Started by scottw, 02/09/2007 08:15PM
Posted 02/09/2007 08:15PM Opening Post
Tough question?
Is it better to get a 8" Portaball or a 12" Lightbridge?
Money/size differences vs. quality optics/design.

Any thoughts would be appreciated!

Hope to order something soon.

Thanks Scott
Posted 02/10/2007 02:28AM | Edited 02/10/2007 02:30AM #1
Buy the 12" Lightbridge and enjoy it while you are saving your money for the 12.5" Portaball (for however long that takes), then sell the Lightbridge!

Randy Roy
Posted 02/12/2007 04:37PM | Edited 02/12/2007 04:37PM #2
A British astro magazine just did a review of the 12" Lightbridge and found the optics tested quite well and performed excellently. There was a quote about how such an inexpensive scope would embarass many high end instruments in visual performance so it sounds like at least the test scope was a winner optically. I own a 12.5" Portaball and had a 10" PB before. The Portaball is my absolute favorite all-around telescope of all the scopes I have owned or tried. The PB and a dedicated planetary scope - a 10" Mak at the moment - are all I need. So why are there six other scopes crowding me out???
Posted 02/12/2007 05:56PM #3
The Portaball is one great, albeit expensive, telescope.

Dave Mitsky

Chance favors the prepared mind.

De gustibus non est disputandum.