I would be fine with Beshear. He's a whole lot smarter than the self proclaimed stable genius who has trouble stringing three sentences together without losing his train of thought. While I don't think a president should be handled I agree with Jim B. and sure glad he is. At least this time.Originally Posted by Rod KaufmanKarl Rove, aka "Bush's brain", on three Democrats as he sees as winners in the 2028 presidential election: glad to see Andy Beshear is one of 'em: https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5845302-democrats-winning-formula-rove/
IMO, Beshear has the best shot and will likely win it if the progressive Democrats in the party don't screw it up...
WSJ: White House Leak Reveals Trump Booted From Briefing After Hours-Long Freakout
Started by jimmoscheck, 04/20/2026 03:58AM
Posted 04/24/2026 12:21AM
| Edited 04/24/2026 12:22AM
#20
Posted 04/26/2026 04:40AM
#21
Agreed, but no one, not even the most die hard democrat ever born can say with a straight face that Biden did not need to be handled. So, I’m not sure if we should not all look in the mirror and ponder why the heck we keep electing candidates with fire in the belly, but little or no competence?Originally Posted by Jim Moscheck
So, the POTUS must be handled? Not the best endorsement for his competence.
Posted 04/26/2026 04:51AM
#22
You lost me at “most say”. I reckon I’m an arrogant prick for saying this, but most of the citizens of the United States who even think about the Supreme Court at all view them as partisan hacks. What choice do they have given the nature of our hyper-partisan news reporting? Seriously, readers of the left wing press think Alito is Satan, and readers of the right wing press think Sotomayor is Beelzebub. They are both wrong, but I know I’m beating a dead horse.Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman
"Chalk up one for the “system”."
"Most say Supreme Court avoids anti-Trump rulings"
"The Marquette School of Law national poll released Thursday found that 57 percent of respondents said the high court is sparing Trump from orders that strike his agenda; the same results were recorded in a January survey."
"A majority of Democrats, 79 percent, agreed with the sentiment that the Supreme Court avoids adverse Trump rulings, and 66 percent of independents said they feel the same, according to the poll."
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5845125-supreme-court-ruling-trump-tariffs/
My guess is that about 0.1% of the population has ever read a Supreme Court opinion or has ever thought about the subtleties and nuances that go into the Court’s decisions. So it goes.
Posted 04/26/2026 04:54AM
#23
I hope you’re right. I would prefer Shapiro, but I don’t think that’s plausible given the current state of affairs.Originally Posted by Rod KaufmanKarl Rove, aka "Bush's brain", on three Democrats as he sees as winners in the 2028 presidential election: glad to see Andy Beshear is one of 'em: https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5845302-democrats-winning-formula-rove/
IMO, Beshear has the best shot and will likely win it if the progressive Democrats in the party don't screw it up...
Posted 04/26/2026 04:18PM
#24
Originally Posted by James Brown
I hope you’re right. I would prefer Shapiro, but I don’t think that’s plausible given the current state of affairs.
Democrats got very practical in 2020 in the face of another Trump term when they opted for Joe Biden. Maybe they will see clearly in 28 again. We can only hope. The other hope is that sanity returns to the GOP in 28, but that looks like a real long shot today.
