Hi all, (Reposting again from Beginners forum)
May be this has already been discussed before.
I had a chance to take some sample images using Starlight Xpress Mx516 camera using both MaxImDL 4 (demo) and the usual Star_Mx5 old world executable. To my surprise the time of image download by Star_mx5.exe is little but noticeably faster and the image look to have a better contrast! After trying to compare both on MaxImDL the Histogram / screen stretch window the curb looks similar but not exactly the same; may be because of extra fraction if image download time! Also in the same experiment noticed the higher contrast of the image taken by Star_Mx5.
Is there any special settings that needs to be made in order to achieve the same result from MaxImDL?
Thank you in advance,
Ansuman.
May be this has already been discussed before.
I had a chance to take some sample images using Starlight Xpress Mx516 camera using both MaxImDL 4 (demo) and the usual Star_Mx5 old world executable. To my surprise the time of image download by Star_mx5.exe is little but noticeably faster and the image look to have a better contrast! After trying to compare both on MaxImDL the Histogram / screen stretch window the curb looks similar but not exactly the same; may be because of extra fraction if image download time! Also in the same experiment noticed the higher contrast of the image taken by Star_Mx5.
Is there any special settings that needs to be made in order to achieve the same result from MaxImDL?
Thank you in advance,
Ansuman.
FluffyDuck observatory
Celestron 8N/CG5 NON GOTO
Canon 20D, Neximage,MX516
Losmandy G11 GOTO
