Image of the day

Captured by
Byron Davies

Sh2-86 (NGC-6820)

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

NGC 4565 - more mount fiddling

Started by hakescl, 06/14/2009 01:29PM
Posted 06/14/2009 01:29PM Opening Post
So I thought I was totally done with one axis... but not so fast. I will likely have a few more nights of mount tweaking before I can say I am done, and I might only get to the "good enough" point. I am also tempted to open up the fork and work on the DEC gears to see if I can tighten the slop up a bit. At least it feels productive to get some sort of image out of these nights.

Anyway... 7x5minutes here (over a couple of hours). Still have DEC guiding off with this image. I was not familiar with this object, but it looks like it might be worth a return trip.

Charlie


Charlie


Attached Image:

hakescl's attachment for post 47182

Fort Lewis Observatory: (37.238, -108.052) ~2360m (7744 ft.) elevation.
Darkness - typically 6.5+
Scope - Meade 16" LX200; f6.3 focal reducer
Focus - JMI Smart focus
Camera - SBIG ST-10XE; (~.5"/pixel)
Guiding - AO-8 and/or Meade 5"/DSI/PHD
http://www.fortlewis.edu/observatory
Posted 06/14/2009 08:38PM #1
Nice image Charlie. I am glad to see you get productivity out of your fiddling activity. Seems like "frosting on the cake".

I think NGC 4565 is an attractive target. It is particularly fun if you get a good seeing night as there is lots of detail. A visit with the color filters is worthwhile as well.

On the mount, are you concerned that the DEC slop is impacting your tracking in DEC? (so you are not DEC guiding?) I have always wanted to figure out how to do a Dec equivalent to the "East side heavy" approch with RA. Of course that implies a deliberate polar alignment offset which seems counter intuitive. Seems that where I am out now is most of my tweaking is done and I suspect differences I see are related to sky position and slight balance / mount differences in those positions. Further tweaking seems to achieve at best diminishing returns and at worst conflicting results. What is your main tweaking area now - Are you tweaking balance optimums? or gear engagement? or what?

Jim Thommes

Mak-Newt 152 mm
C8
Megrez II APO
Zenithstar 66 mm APO
G11/Gemini
ST8300M
Artemis285 Camera
Canon 350D DSLR

http://jthommes.com/Astro/
Posted 06/14/2009 11:01PM #2
It looks good Charlie! It sure is hard to stop "fiddling". smile Good luck making those last few adjustments. It seems to be producing excellent results.
Cheers,
Tyler

"The expression of the beautiful is in direct ratio to the power of perception acquired by the artist." (Gustave Courbet)