So I thought I would go ahead and post this. Actually it was a lot of fun. For those of you who have done Sh2-240 you know you need a wide field and good decent exposure. I'm not sure I got enough of either. (and I was binned 2x2 at f/4 with the H-Alpha).
Frequently, I do a high bin (4x4) test image for 30 seconds or so to verify object framing. For this guy, I binned 5x5 and still couldn't see anything in the test image. Talk about your faint fuzzies.
The full size image is here:
http://jthommes.com/Astro/Sh2-240.htm
Processing was, well, interesting. A lot of effort to see the nebula so yes, overprocessing is rampant here. I deliberately set the background high to see more structure.
So it was a lot of fun, but it's already on my list for next year as a retry.
Frequently, I do a high bin (4x4) test image for 30 seconds or so to verify object framing. For this guy, I binned 5x5 and still couldn't see anything in the test image. Talk about your faint fuzzies.
The full size image is here:
http://jthommes.com/Astro/Sh2-240.htm
Processing was, well, interesting. A lot of effort to see the nebula so yes, overprocessing is rampant here. I deliberately set the background high to see more structure.
So it was a lot of fun, but it's already on my list for next year as a retry.
Jim Thommes
Mak-Newt 152 mm
C8
Megrez II APO
Zenithstar 66 mm APO
G11/Gemini
ST8300M
Artemis285 Camera
Canon 350D DSLR
http://jthommes.com/Astro/