Hi all,
After seeing Jims image with a interseting white spot I got to wondering if it isn't better to keep capture times for Saturn on the short side. The rotational period for Saturn is only slightly longer than that of Jupiter so any fine details would be smeared by overall capture periods of longer than probably about 3 minutes (depending of course on what FL you're imaging at) maybe 4 if you don't mind a bit of smearing.
The whole trick is to get enough useable frames to beat down the noise, so I can understand why some people opt just to go for a more aesthetically pleasing image and therefore forego any possiblity of capturing fine details. Another factor if one has a colour camera its much easier than if you have a colour wheel. What are the capture times that are being used by most here? I know John B used about a 10 minute capture time for his amazing WSP Saturn image... and that image showed wonderful banding detail that could'nt probably be had with a short capture time. So perhaps its just a matter of a trade-off?
cheers
Mike
After seeing Jims image with a interseting white spot I got to wondering if it isn't better to keep capture times for Saturn on the short side. The rotational period for Saturn is only slightly longer than that of Jupiter so any fine details would be smeared by overall capture periods of longer than probably about 3 minutes (depending of course on what FL you're imaging at) maybe 4 if you don't mind a bit of smearing.
The whole trick is to get enough useable frames to beat down the noise, so I can understand why some people opt just to go for a more aesthetically pleasing image and therefore forego any possiblity of capturing fine details. Another factor if one has a colour camera its much easier than if you have a colour wheel. What are the capture times that are being used by most here? I know John B used about a 10 minute capture time for his amazing WSP Saturn image... and that image showed wonderful banding detail that could'nt probably be had with a short capture time. So perhaps its just a matter of a trade-off?
cheers
Mike