After side by side field tests with my TV 102 refractor, I pretty much found out what worked well with that particular system and what did not..(Meade 14mm UWA) & an (Apogee 30mm. Wide Scan II.) were winners. Now with the New Celestron C8 I will begin again... All you C8 owners out there must have some "favorites" would like to hear your performance rating on a few EP's. I realize the field of view will be different, as I found out with a MN-76 Mak/Newt. I had for awhile, could not enjoy objects like the Double Cluster in Perseus the way I could with the 102. The 102 at 16X (TV 55mm. Plossl) framed the famous double with an inky black background and center stage appeared the twin clusters, like a Jewel Box glistening! With the Mak. nothing but stars filled the entire EP field.
On Planets: Will have to gear-up for Aug. Debut of The Anger Red One. what will be the odds/on favorite EP in this catagory? Ortho? Rad? Nag? or Plossl.
And in the DSO realm what compliments the C8 the best? Could only resolve M-57 using averted vision with the 102. Was a little better at 5000' Elev. (OR Star Party) last Aug. Cassini was hit and miss , Better with the 7" Mak. Looking forward to "1st light" with the C8. Will keep you all posted. Regards, John M
On Planets: Will have to gear-up for Aug. Debut of The Anger Red One. what will be the odds/on favorite EP in this catagory? Ortho? Rad? Nag? or Plossl.
And in the DSO realm what compliments the C8 the best? Could only resolve M-57 using averted vision with the 102. Was a little better at 5000' Elev. (OR Star Party) last Aug. Cassini was hit and miss , Better with the 7" Mak. Looking forward to "1st light" with the C8. Will keep you all posted. Regards, John M
