Hi everyone- I'm seriously thinking of buying a GPS 11 with XLT coatings. I'd like to know your opinion if you have one of these scopes. I'm particularly interested in the optical quality.
Opinion on GPS11
Started by Gerry F, 12/08/2004 03:01AM
Posted 12/08/2004 03:01AM
Opening Post
Posted 12/08/2004 02:52PM
#1
I have a number of friends who own GPS11's and absolutely love them!! Two of the great amateur planetary imagers (Jesús Sánchez and Damian Peach) both use C11's for most of their images and they are as good as they get.
Good luck!!
Paul Maxson
Good luck!!
Paul Maxson
Paul Maxson
Moderator - CCD Imaging and Processing/Solar System
Celestron C14, Mewlon 250, Orion EON120, ASI120MM, Flea3.
http://www.sunspot51.com
Posted 12/09/2004 01:53AM
#2
Hi Gerry,
I bought the aluminum tube version of the Nexstar GPS C11 XLT from Anacortes about 8 weeks and I really am happy with it. The goto and tracking work great. The optical quality appears to be excellent. I need to do some more critical testing to be sure though. But so far, the star mages are just beautiful and the detail on the Moon is awesome. I also saw the crepe ring on Saturn without any problem and a nice sharp cassini division all the way around. So far so good. The only drawback is the weight. It does take a fair effort to carry it around. Almost forgot, the motors are very quiet too! Much better than other scopes i have "heard" in the night.
John
I bought the aluminum tube version of the Nexstar GPS C11 XLT from Anacortes about 8 weeks and I really am happy with it. The goto and tracking work great. The optical quality appears to be excellent. I need to do some more critical testing to be sure though. But so far, the star mages are just beautiful and the detail on the Moon is awesome. I also saw the crepe ring on Saturn without any problem and a nice sharp cassini division all the way around. So far so good. The only drawback is the weight. It does take a fair effort to carry it around. Almost forgot, the motors are very quiet too! Much better than other scopes i have "heard" in the night.
John
Posted 12/12/2004 12:30AM
| Edited 12/12/2004 12:31AM
#3
I was pleasantly suprised that my 11 turned out to be even better (est. ~1/10 wave spherical correction) than my 12" Meade LX200 (~1/8 correction, based on abberator star test). Let me say that the 11 is far easier to handle from a weight and bulk standpoint, must be placement of the handles, and the molded curves because the 10lbs difference alone can't be responsible.
"--Granted, that's a worse case scenario. The destruction might in fact be ... limited to our own galaxy."
Funding Member