Image of the day

Captured by
Michael Scherman

Cats Paw Nebula Televue NP127IS

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

New Light Shed on an Old Dispute Between Einstein and Bohr

06/13/2010 02:22AM

New Light Shed on an Old Dispute Between Einstein and Bohr

From the early days of quantum mechanics, Albert Einstein did not hide his dissatisfaction with the statistical nature of quantum mechanics and the fact that certain observations such as location and time cannot be simultaneously measured with any accuracy. By the mid 1930s, Einstein had accepted quantum mechanics as a consistent theory for the statistics of the behavior of atoms. Eventually the applications would include transistors, lasers, a new chemistry, and more. Yet Einstein could not accept quantum mechanics as a complete theory, for its mathematics did not describe individual events. Einstein felt that a more basic theory, one that could completely describe how each individual atom behaved, might yet be found. By following the approach of his own general theory of relativity, he hoped to dig deeper than quantum mechanics. The search for a deeper theory was to occupy much of the rest of his life.


Comments:

  • patsmn61 [Pat Peak]
  • 06/13/2010 06:23PM
Excellent piece. We seem to forget that there were other great minds besides Einstein, who gets all of the publicity outside of the scientific community. Thanks Astromart!

Actually, the evidence for "entanglement" is perfectly consistent with Einstein's Leibnizian outlook. Podolsky and Rosen did not grasp the deeper implications of Einstein's thinking on the subject, often a problem when we try to reduce an idea into an empirically verifiable formulation. (You see, Einstein rejected Mach, and Bohr's empiricism.) <br> Those unfamiliar with the philosophical bases of Einstein's thought, may try to comprehend the question this way: Clearly General Relativity is a "non-local" conception. How is then that Einstein would insist on locality as a principle? Either suppose that he was utterly inconsistent in his thinking, or that you may not be grasping the matter completely.
  • Doink [Chris Reich]
  • 06/14/2010 11:53PM
Absolutely correct. I think, in making stories like this comprehensible to most of us, the complexity is removed. But the complexity matters. Since Einstein developed the concept of space-time, we can surmise from general relativity that should the sun suddenly vanish, there would be no speed of gravity. The earth would instantly continue in a straight line even though light would continue for 8+ minutes.<br><br>It is a beautiful universe.<br><br>Chris Reich