Image of the day

Captured by
Lawrence Parchman

Eastern Veil Nebula

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Thinking about a mount....

Started by SunSpot51, 12/11/2006 12:44AM
Posted 12/11/2006 12:44AM Opening Post
Hi all,

Now that I have the DSO imaging bug I'm thinking about a new mount for my Orion ED100. I have the Skyview Pro with dual axis drives, but would love to mount the scope on a mount that supports autoguiding. I see the Atlas mount does just this. IYHO would this be a good option or do any of you have another suggestion. Thing is, the OTA weights probably 10 pounds or so, so basically the mount is overkill. The lower end Orion mounts don't have the autoguider ability. My new camera, an ST2000 XCM is due in any day now.

Hey, thanks to all!!
Paul Maxson

Paul Maxson
Moderator - CCD Imaging and Processing/Solar System
Celestron C14, Mewlon 250, Orion EON120, ASI120MM, Flea3.
http://www.sunspot51.com
Posted 12/11/2006 01:40AM #1
Paul, when Imaging, there is no such thing as being OVERMOUNTED. Just get the best mount you can get... so that you won't have to think about "upgrades" for a while... 8)

I have not heard much about the Atlas and Astrophotography, but I guess that should be fine...

Other options would be a GM-8, a G-11 or a CGE, for example...

Ivan Gastaldo 8)
Coconut Creek, FL

Ivan's Observatory
Lat 26N 16' 48" Long 80W 10' 48"
[COLOR="Red"]Personal Website:[/COLOR] http://www.ivangastaldo.com

CCD Imaging and Processing/Deep Sky - Moderator
I like to complain about everything - Moderator
Posted 12/11/2006 01:40AM | Edited 12/11/2006 01:42AM #2
Paul, I would consider a Losmandy GM-8. It is fairly small and lightweight, and would easily handle your scope. You will definitely want to use the autoguider in the ST2000.... I wouldn't even consider a mount without autoguiding capability. When it comes to deep space work, if there is any one place not to skimp, it is the mount. Spend the money now and you may be able to use the mount for many years. In fact, you may want to go up to a G-11, then you could go with much heavier scopes in the future without upgrading the mount. That is my 2-cents worth.
Cheers,
Tyler

"The expression of the beautiful is in direct ratio to the power of perception acquired by the artist." (Gustave Courbet)
Posted 12/11/2006 01:46AM | Edited 12/11/2006 01:47AM #3
Paul,
How about a Tak EM-200? It's good for up to 25-27 lbs for imaging so you will have lots of capacity room to spare. The GM-8 has a weaker tripod, unless you use a G-11 tripod.
Ivan
Posted 12/11/2006 11:29AM #4
Hello:
I would think that a G-8 or G-11 would work well. I was out last night with a friend showing me how to use the ST-4 with my G-11, and the autoguiding worked well but windshake was an issue. The G-11 was holding a pair of 4" refractors at the time. My friend was using a G-8 with a 4" refractor and a ST2000 CCD. If you want rock-like stability, another friend of mine shoots with a 4" refractor and a 60mm guide scope on an NJP mount! No stability problems there! I agree with the notion that when it comes to astrophotography, no mount is too big.

Cheers
Mike