Image of the day

Captured by
Byron Davies

Sh2-86 (NGC-6820)

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Sh2-112 - Ha RGB

Started by jthommes, 07/29/2007 05:16AM
Posted 07/29/2007 05:16AM Opening Post
Hi Folks,
Below is a link to an image I made of Sh2-112. Attention in Cygnus is sometimes dominated by the North American Nebula and the Pelican. I picked this up and Sh2-115 in the vicinity earlier this month (Sh2-115 to come later.)

Full size image and processing / exposure data are at:

http://jthommes.com/Astro/SH2-112.htm

This is an Ha RGB image with a C8 at f/3.7 and my Artemis285


Jim Thommes

Mak-Newt 152 mm
C8
Megrez II APO
Zenithstar 66 mm APO
G11/Gemini
ST8300M
Artemis285 Camera
Canon 350D DSLR

http://jthommes.com/Astro/
Posted 07/29/2007 05:31AM #1
Beautiful shot Jim, quite an interesting object... 8)
Thank you for sharing these "not so popular" objects with us,

Ivan Gastaldo 8)
Coconut Creek, FL

Ivan's Observatory
Lat 26N 16' 48" Long 80W 10' 48"
[COLOR="Red"]Personal Website:[/COLOR] http://www.ivangastaldo.com

CCD Imaging and Processing/Deep Sky - Moderator
I like to complain about everything - Moderator
Posted 07/29/2007 11:28AM #2
hi Jim,

very nice result!
your setup works beautifully obviously!

clear skies, guys!
Dietmar
---
www.stargazer-observatory.com
Posted 07/29/2007 11:56AM #3
Nicely done Jim!

Tom

Starsearch Observatory
Lat 42N 47' 00" Long 112W 10' 47"
Elev 1752m
www.tvdavisastropics.com
Posted 07/30/2007 12:57AM #4
Jim, well done!

From your web site I see you have an assortment of focal reducers and spacers, which did you use for this image? I'm not too happy with the results that the Meade f/3.3 gives with my C8 but this image is very nice.

Eric
Posted 07/30/2007 01:31AM #5
Thanks all for the comments...

Eric,
Using focal reducers on the C8 is always a bit iffy. In this case I used the Meade 0.33x reducer. I had it spaced from the CCD about 48 mm. For the rated reduction, I think the optimum is 58 mm. It is somewhat forgiving for shorter distances if your imaging set up back focus is short. In fact, it can perform relatively well. Beyond the 58 mm reducer spacing and edge quality deteriorates rapidly.

My chip is 11 mm in diagonal - much bigger and the Meade 0.33x reducer begins to loose it. So small chip size and be sure you don't go over 58 mm and some results can be achieved. Looking closely at the image though, you can see the optics imperfections impacting the edge of the frame.

Jim Thommes

Mak-Newt 152 mm
C8
Megrez II APO
Zenithstar 66 mm APO
G11/Gemini
ST8300M
Artemis285 Camera
Canon 350D DSLR

http://jthommes.com/Astro/
Posted 07/30/2007 01:40AM #6
Looking good Jim!



Jason
Posted 07/30/2007 01:13PM #7
Nice one, Jim! Isn't this called the Nautilus nebula sometimes for its resemblance to the marine creature?

Eric
Posted 07/31/2007 04:12AM #8
Jason, Eric,
Thanks for the comments.

Eric,
Nautilus Nebula, huh. I wasn't aware of a common name as such. I did a quick Google on Nautilus Nebula and came up with a planetary - NGC 6210. But now that you mention it, it does have a resemblance. How do we petition the Astronomical Union for an Object Common Name?

Jim Thommes

Mak-Newt 152 mm
C8
Megrez II APO
Zenithstar 66 mm APO
G11/Gemini
ST8300M
Artemis285 Camera
Canon 350D DSLR

http://jthommes.com/Astro/
Posted 07/31/2007 05:02AM #9
That is a really nice image Jim! I may need to add this object to my "must do someday" list. smile
Cheers,
Tyler

"The expression of the beautiful is in direct ratio to the power of perception acquired by the artist." (Gustave Courbet)