Whats the worst scope you had?

Ok guys and gals,

We just did a thread on the most perfect scope.
So what is the worst scope you have owned?
Bad optics, mount, or other is fine.

Chas

Intes MN-74 Great optics, almost impossible (for me) to collimate.

A Meade ETX 70, the lens had at least 10 waves of zonal error, and no the lens was not in backwards. Doesn't someone look thru these things even once before shipping?

Hands down it was a 50mm scope with a plate glass singlet lense about f30. The eyepieces were also singlets, so chromatic aberration was an abomination. The tube was a mess of glued together cardboard, and the mount was so undersized, it was originally designed to hold a small surveyors leveling telescope. The whole thing shook like a leaf in the slightest breeze.

But hey, I made it myself when I was in grade school, and it showed me the rings of Saturn, the moons of Jupiter, and the true face of the moon for the very first time.

Yep, truly the worst scope I have ever had, and I absolutely loved every minute using it.



[SIZE="Small"]
[[COLOR="Blue"]QUOTE]Charles Peterson said:

Ok guys and gals,

We just did a thread on the most perfect scope.
So what is the worst scope you have owned?
Bad optics, mount, or other is fine.

Chas[/QUOTE][/COLOR][/SIZE]

Meade 97D spotting scope. I once checked to see why the primary mirror seemed to be out of alignment. I discovered that it was held in place by a big disk of goey double stick tape ! I was able to see the results of the Shoemaker - Levy 9 impacts on Jupiter with it though. Of course my Dynascope RV-6 showed way more detail when I used it later that Summer. I think I actually paid less for the RV-6 !

Joplin

Charles Peterson said:

Ok guys and gals,

We just did a thread on the most perfect scope.
So what is the worst scope you have owned?
Bad optics, mount, or other is fine.

Chas

I bought this Baytronix so I could write a "honest" review. If they were as bad as people said, I wanted it documented. It was bad...

http://www.cloudynights.com/item.php?item_id=1105

It seems to be the first hit when googling Baytronix and I regular Emails about it...

JOn

Attached Image:

Charles Peterson said:

Ok guys and gals,

We just did a thread on the most perfect scope.
So what is the worst scope you have owned?
Bad optics, mount, or other is fine.

Chas

Tasco 3-inch alt-az Newt (1965). OK on the Moon and deep sky, but Jupe looked like a custard pie.

8)

My first scope, purchased in the 1950s from Criterion for the princely (to me) sum of $18.95. The objective was about 1-1/8" diameter. It didn't have eyepieces but had some loose glass lenses that you could arrange in the cardboard drawtube for various magnifications up to 400x (!) Needless to say, I saw nothing but dim blobs of light at 400x, but at 35x I could see craters on the Moon and was thrilled. It had a tall shaky tripod (basically three broom handles) with a ball-and-socket camera mount at the top. It also had a little finder but the dog ate it.

Well...I think the worst thing I can remember...
was when I had no scope at all.
Now that was really bad!
Linton


but it's alright now...

I have owned 3 different C11's, all were pure lemons. I think I am cursed with C11's. I have owned C8, C925 and C14 all were excellent, just not the C11's.